Taker, Edward

Edward Taker, c1865-a1909

aka Edward Teager, Edward Teaguer

Son of Jim Taker and Ellen Farrell

Edward Teager, Pentridge, 1893

Discovery

Edward Teaguer was my great-great-great uncle on my mother’s side. He lived most of his life as Edward Teaguer, but was born Edward Taker, and for some time known as Edward Teager. See “The Teager Name” for the saga of the family surname.

Edward was a new character in the family saga. I had previously discovered three daughters of James and Ellen Teager (née Farrell): Victoria Julia, Mary Ann Edith, and Ellen. Julia was my great-great-grandmother. Believing the Teagers to be of Irish descent and that our Chinese connection began with Julia’s marriage to Ah Hiah, I was rather surprised to find the 1893 prison record for an Edward Teager with two photographs showing him to have very Chinese features [01]. A copy of his marriage certificate confirmed that he was the son of James and Ellen Teager (spelled Teaguer on the document). Was he the result of an affair between James and a Chinese women but recorded as Ellen’s son? Highly unlikely, as there were almost no Chinese women on the Victorian gold fields. Was he the result of an affair between Ellen and a Chinese man? Possibly, especially given my later discovery that James and Ellen’s third child, James, was actually the son of Ellen and police constable Christopher Molony. It all became clearer with the revelation that Jim/James Taker/Teager/Teaguer was Chinese from Amoy, so all of the children of James and Ellen (except James junior) were half-Chinese and half-Irish. It has turned out that Edward’s colourful career has provided a lot of information about him, mainly through newspaper reports, but there are also key gaps in the story.

Edward Taker – Childhood and Youth

Edward was born in around 1865. He grew up as Edward Taker.

1880:    In 1880, Edward was arrested and charged with “being an idle and disorderly person, having no visible lawful means of support”. Described as a “half-caste Chinese, sixteen years of age”, he appeared before Justices of the Peace Hughes and Lynch at the Smythesdale Police Court on Thursday, 14 October 1880. He was remanded until the following Tuesday and ordered to be “examined by a medical man“. The newspaper noted that: “it is being reported that the accused had been guilty of an abominable offence[02]. The newspaper reported him as Edward Teaguer, which seems to be the earliest mention of this spelling.

The following Tuesday – 19 October – he was again in the Smythesdale Police Court, appearing before J Keith, JP, and K Lynch, JP [03]:

“Edward Teager, a half-caste Chinese lad living at Haddon, was complained against by the police for having no lawful visible means of support. Mr Hockley, who appeared for the defendant, stated that his client would go to work if he was let off this time. Senior-constable Crampton intimated that as it had been found that the defendant was not guilty of a very serious offence with which he had been charged, he would not press the charge of vagrancy. The bench then dismissed the prisoner with a caution.”
Note the spelling of Edward Teager. The serious offence mentioned was presumably the “abominable” one mentioned on the 14th, so apparently he was found not guilty.

Edward Teager, Chinese Interpreter

Between 1880 and 1892 we have no real visibility of Edward’s life.  He apparently married at some point during this period as his 1893 prison record mentions a wife, Mrs A Teager, living in Trentham [04]. By the 1890s, he was working in Melbourne as a Chinese Interpreter, identifying as Edward Teager. An 1898 interview in Perth notes that he had been an interpreter in Victoria for 14 years (so, since 1884?) and a mention in a session of the Western Australian Legislative Council notes that he knew seven or eight Chinese dialects, which is also the number of languages/dialects identified on the Ballarat gold field in 1855 [05].
Chinese Theatricals in Melbourne, Illustrated Australian News for Home Readers, 16 July, 1872

Impresario?

1892:    The Age (Melbourne) of 2 January 1892 has a long article about “A Novel Theatrical Show – Chinese Plays in Melbourne” [06]. It is a fascinating article, but the main point of interest for our story is: “The enterprise has been undertaken by Messrs E Teager and Co.” This seems a lot for the 27-year-old Edward to take on, but I haven’t encountered another E Teager as yet.

In a court appearance on 22 December 1892, Edward was committed for trial on a charge of perjury [07]. Bail was set on two sureties of £30 (or £50) each “and was immediately forthcoming[08]. At the age of 27, how did Edward have that much money? A hint comes in a case in 1896, where he was said to have made £50 assisting the prosecution in another case (see below).

Edward was sentenced to two years hard labour.

1894:    After release in from prison in 1894, Edward returned to work as an interpreter, including assisting legal counsel in court cases. He did have further run-ins with the law and the Chinese community over the next couple of years.

Edward Teaguer

1895:    Edward married Gertrude Emma Pearce on 30 March 1895. At the time, Edward was living in Victoria Street, Melbourne. Gertrude was an actress from Adelaide and born in Kent, England, in around 1874. She was currently living – and perhaps working – in Adelaide.

Edward was using the Teaguer spelling by this stage – such as on his marriage certificate – though newspaper reports of his involvement in court cases in 1895 and 1896 still called him Teager. Meeting and marrying an actress is an interesting link back to the “Impresario” question mentioned above.

1896:    July 1896 saw Edward arrested and subsequently appear in court on Wednesday, 29 July. Just the headlines in The Herald report are illuminating: “Chinese Devilment – A Half-Caste Interpreter – Charged With Vagrancy – Remarkable Case – Something About Clans – Chin and Cheong – Case Dismissed.” The court case makes interesting reading [09].

“Edward Teager, a half-caste Chinese interpreter, was brought before Mr Panton, PM, at the City Police Court today on a charge of vagrancy.”
His defence attorney, Mr Kane, stated that the charge of vagrancy was unfounded, as Edward was a married householder with a wife and child, and apparently had earned about £50 assisting Kane on the recent “Chinese Puzzle Case” in the Insolvency Court. Kane accused the losing party of trumping up the charge “out of spite, malice, and Chinese devilment.” It appears that they and the complainants were from the Chan clan, whilst Edward was of the Cheong clan. This is the first mention of a child that I have found and the mention of Cheong connected to my later discovery that Edward’s father, Jim Taker, was Cheong Tak.

It would appear that Edward and Gertrude were setting up their wine shop. The fortnightly sitting of the Metropolitan Licencing Court at the Melbourne Insolvency Court on 2 September 1896 granted the transfer of a “colonial wine licence” from Henrietta Nichol to Gertrude Teaguer of 243 Gertrude Street, Fitzroy. Judge Molesworth and the Police Magistrates Joseph Anderson Panton and Charles Hope Nicolson were on the bench [10].

243 (left) Gertrude Street, Fitzroy
The Victoria Police Gazette reported that Edward was assaulted by an unknown man at their wine shop at 243 Gertrude Street, Fitzroy, on 7 December 1896. The man was described as “about 27 years of age, 5 feet six inches high, medium build, brown hair, small moustache only; wore a brown sac suit and a light felt hat.” The man was arrested on 18 December and identified as Benjamin Marks. No further details at this stage [11].

Whether as a result of these events and a desire to move or just a need to liquidate assets, Edward sold 243 Gertrude Street and its contents to Ellen Elizabeth Hayling, who is described as a financier, for £5. The contract is dated 22 December 1896. He also entered into a contract to rent it all back for £1 10/- per six week period. Seems like an odd arrangement as Hayling would make her money back in less than four months. Perhaps this had something to do with the creation of “E Teaguer and Co,” apparently in Western Australia (see below). Gertrude continued to operate the wine shop. In fact, she is listed in the 1897 edition of the Sands Directory at the wine shop at 243 Gertrude Street, Fitzroy. No mention of Edward and Gertrude is listed as “Miss G Teaguer.” Miss? [12].

The building at 243 Gertrude Street is still there. Combined with the neighbouring 245 Gertrude Street, it is a beer garden today – The Fitzroy Beer Garden – and part of a precinct of historical significance [13].

Perth

A move to Perth came next, possibly due to the apparent bad blood between Edward and the Chan clan of the Melbourne Chinese community, as evidenced by the charge and court case in July 1896. By early 1898 and through to at least 1900, he was working as an interpreter with the Chinese community, the Perth courts, and even the Western Australian government. Before that, though, he may have set up a greengrocer business.

Advertisement in the Coolgardie Miner, 1897

1897:    An “E Teaguer and Co” advertised for four weeks from early September 1897 in the Coolgardie Miner: “E Teaguer and Co, Greengrocers and Producers. E T and Co will supply direct from the soil. Those dealing with this firm in the winter months shall be supplied in the summer. Orders accompanied by cash shall receive prompt attention. A trial solicited. Commercial-road, Midland Junction[14]. The advertisement was also run in the Northern Mining Register and the Swan Advertiser. Midland Junction is about 15km north-east of Perth. Advertising in a Coolgardie newspaper is a bit strange, as Coolgardie is about 550km east of Midland Junction. At this stage I have no further information about this business and it is just the uniqueness of “E Teaguer” that makes the connection.

Meanwhile, the wine license for 243 Gertrude Street had been transferred from Gertrude to a Bessie Robertson on 17 March [15]. Coming only six months after gaining the wine license, this would suggest that the move to Perth could have been rather hasty.

SS Marloo
1898:    In January/February 1898, an “E Teaguer” was on the SS Marloo, travelling alone from Melbourne to Fremantle via Adelaide and on a passenger list from Adelaide to Perth. Gertrude is not listed on the passenger lists so may have remained in Melbourne at first. A Mrs Teaguer was certainly in Perth by June 1900 at the latest [16].

Edward seems to have got involved in the Chinese community straight away, so perhaps he moved to work specifically with the Chinese Freemasons or the Perth courts. In March 1898, the Perth Daily News published the Code of Rules for a proposed Chinese Freemasons Lodge at the request of “Mr E Teaguer, interpreter for the… lodge[17]. It is worth quoting the Code of Rules in full, as its content and the desire to publish it show that the proposed lodge is obviously attempting to address some of the concerns of the European authorities and population about the Chinese community. It also shows the degree of Edward’s literacy and translation skills if he created the translation for publication alone.

“The members will be compelled to subscribe a sufficient amount to cover the cost of the passage back to China of any other member who has become indigent and unable to work. Any member engaged in a disturbance with any other person who is not connected with the lodge shall be fined £5, in default of payment of which he shall be debarred from taking part in the deliberations of the lodge, or otherwise exercising the privileges of membership. The members will be compelled to provide sick members with medical advice and attendance, and also board and lodgings during their illness. Members will have to find work for any unemployed member. Country members in indigent circumstances shall be allowed to live at the lodge premises free of cost. In the event of any member desiring to look for work in the country and having no money, the lodge shall allow him £1 for travelling expenses. In the event of any member meeting another member who is in indigent circumstances, he shall be compelled to assist him financially and otherwise. In the event of a member dying, the lodge shall bury him, and pay to the widow and children, if there are any, £10. It shall be compulsory for the members to attend the funeral of the deceased member, in default, a fine of 10s, unless a certificate of ill-health be produced. All members of the lodge shall be honest, upright, and straightforward, and shall be fined £1 if found guilty of fomenting any disturbance in the lodge premises. Chew Hoy has been elected Grand-Master of the lodge, and Ah Tuck secretary and treasurer.”
Edward acted as interpreter in the Perth courts over the next couple of years, and was also heavily involved in the West Australian parliament’s inquiry into Chinese immigration and the possible presence into leprosy in the colony.

1899:    Edward appeared before Mr Augustus Sanford Roe, Police Magistrate, at the City Police Court on 13 March 1899:

“…charged with having obtained from Ah Cooy the sum of £10 by falsely representing to him that on payment of that sum he could obtain from the Government permission to keep open his business premises till a later hour than he was then doing. Mr Vyner appeared to prosecute and Mr Robinson (Messrs Haynes, Robinson, Sholl and Foulkes) for the defendant. On the application of Mr Vyner, the accused was remanded” [18].
The basis of the charge is interesting, in that it echoes the claims made by witnesses in Edward’s trial in Melbourne in July 1896. At that trial, the charge of vagrancy was dismissed and the claims of obtaining money under false pretences made during the trial were not considered relevant to that charge.

The case went to trial before Mr Roe and W J Holmes, JP, on 20 March.

“Ah Cooey was called, and he blew out a wax match, but the accused objected, as the witness had not sworn that he recognised that if he told other than the truth his soul would be similarly extinguished by the Supreme Being. The terms having been added, further trouble ensued, through the partisans of either side applying their wily Celestial cuteness in transmitting the evidence to those who had been ordered out of court. The gist of the prosecutor’s evidence was that at the end of February last Teaguer called at the gambling-shop kept by Ah Cooey, in Murray-street, and told him that he would have to pay, through him, £10 per month to the Government in order to conduct his business without interference from the police. The prosecutor had not much money in the house, and he gave the accused £1 on account. Teaguer instructed him that if he did not make up the £9 balance he would be arrested. He asserted he was appointed by the Government. Cross examined: His full name was Chow Ah Cooey, the first appellation designating him as belonging to the Chow clan” [19].
He was back in court on 30 March – again before Mr Roe – this time charged with obtaining money from Wong You. He was further remanded and personal bail renewed [20].

One later reference is the mention of “Edward Teaguer, a restaurant-keeper” [21].

“Patrick Clark pleaded not guilty to a charge of vagrancy. Corporal Kelso deposed that he had known accused for two months, and had never seen him do any work. On Monday night witness heard a disturbance near the Fremantle Park, and found Clark in altercation with two other men, whom he accosted and demanded money of. Edward Teaguer, restaurant-keeper, deposed that several times Clark had come to his place, and after having a meal refused to pay for it. Constable McTavish also gave evidence, in which he stated that the accused’s mother had complained of the son having given her a beating. Mr Fairbairn sent Clark to gaol for three months.”
The mention of Edward as a restaurant-keeper is interesting, but not surprising. Being an interpreter was certainly not a full-time job. In 1897, he had the greengrocer business in Midland Junction, about 20 kilometres to the north-west of Perth. By 1914, he still had a stake in property in the Canning District, to the south-east of Perth, which was also for a greengrocer business. It would make sense that he would be operating a restaurant or cook shop in association with the greengrocer. There is more to be discovered here.

Singapore and Disappearance?

Edward’s involvement as interpreter in a court case in August 1900 is the last reference I have so far to the whereabouts and activities of Edward Teaguer, Interpreter.

1901:    A Mr and Mrs Teaguer and infant travelled from Singapore to Fremantle in July 1901 on the Sultan. They are described as being of British nationality, which would be the case with Edward being born in Australia and Gertrude born in the UK [22]. The arrival of “Teaguer and infant” and “Teaguer” on 24 July is also reported in The Western Australian and Western Mail [23] [24].

If these are truly Edward and Gertrude, the date of the voyage to Singapore and the purpose of the trip are unknown. Why Singapore? His father came from Singapore, via Mauritius, Van Diemen’s Land, and South Australia. That may not be directly relevant, but family and business connections are possible. The infant is probably the child mentioned in the 1896 court case who would have been about 5 years old in 1901.

If they are not our Teaguers, there doesn’t seem to be any trace of who they were or what happened to them.

1902:    A Mr Teaguer also travelled from Singapore to Fremantle on the Saladin in September 1902. He is described as English/British [25]

1903:    A Mrs Teaguer, aged 25, and a male infant sailed on the Orotava in October 1902.

1913:    The trail goes cold on my quest for Edward Teager after 1900-1903. It apparently also went cold for his wife, Gertrude, at some point. She ran notices in The West Australian: “If Edward Teaguer does not communicate with me within two months from this date I intend to re-marry.” [26].

Gertrude married Reuben James Stockden in Perth later in 1913, presumably after having her marriage to Edward anulled [27].

Footnotes

Footnotes
01 Teager, Edward, No 25842; Central Register for Male Prisoners, Volume 47, Prisoner Numbers 25810-26295, p 33 (Series VPRS 515 P0001) [Public Record Office Victoria, 4 April 2024].
02 Smythesdale Police Court; The Ballarat Star, 15 October 1880, p 2 [Trove, 4 April 2024].
03 Smythesdale Police Court; The Ballarat Courier, 21 October 1880, p 4 [Trove, 4 April 2024].
04 I have no other references to this wife and Trentham seems a strange place to live if Edward was working in Melbourne. When Edward married Gertrude Pearce in 1895, he identified himself as a “bachelor”
05 Legislative Assembly; Western Mail (Perth), 23 September 1898, p 15 [Trove, 4 April 2024].
06 A Novel Theatrical Show – Chinese Plays in Melbourne; The Age (Melbourne), 2 January 1892, p 10 [Trove, 4 April 2024].
07 Melbourne; The Ballarat Star, 23 December 1892, p 4 [Trove, 4 April 2024].
08 Was It Perjury?; The Herald (Melbourne), 22 December 1892, p 1 [Trove, 4 April 2024].
09 Chinese Devilment; The Herald (Melbourne), 29 July 1896, p 1 [Trove, 4 April 2024].
10 Metropolitan Licensing Court; The Age (Melbourne), 4 September 1896, p 7 [Trove, 4 April 2024].
11 Victoria Police Gazette, 16 December 1896, p 387, and 23 December 1896, p 396 [Ancestry (Membership required) 4 April 2024].
12 Sands Directory, Melbourne, 1897, p 1131 [Ancestry (Membership required) 4 April 2024].
13 243 Gertrude Street; Heritage Council of Victoria [Trove, 4 April 2024].
14 Advertising; The Coolgardie Miner, 2 September 1897, p 8 [Trove, 4 April 2024]. Repeated from 2 September 1897 to 4 October 1897.
15 Metropolitan Licensing Court; The Argus (Melbourne), 18 March 1897, p 6 [Trove, 4 April 2024].
16 The SS Marloo was built in the UK in 1891 and initially operated as the Francesco Crispi. Purchased by the Adelaide Steamship Co, Ltd, in 1895, it operated around the Australian coast until wrecked off Fraser Island, Queensland, in 1914. Wikipedia
17 Chinese Freemasons Code of Conduct; Daily News (Perth), 14 March 1898, p 3 [Trove, 4 April 2024].
18 City Police Court; The West Australian (Perth), 14 March 1899, p 7 [Trove, 4 April 2024].
19 Chinese and Interpreter; Daily News (Perth), 20 March 1899, p 3 [Trove, 4 April 2024].
20 City Police Court; The West Australian (Perth), 31 March 1899, p 3 [Trove, 4 April 2024].
21 Fremantle Police Court; The West Australian (Perth), 26 July 1899, p 2 [Trove, 4 April 2024].
22 Sultan Passenger List, 24 July 1901 [Ancestry (Membership required) 4 April 2024].
23 Shipping; The West Australian (Perth), 26 July 1901, p 4 [Trove, 4 April 2024].
24 Port of Fremantle; Western Mail (Perth), 3 August 1901, p 35 [Trove, 4 April 2024].
25 Saladin Passenger List, 1 and 2 September 1902 [Ancestry (Membership required) 4 April 2024].
26 Public Notices; The West Australian (Perth), 1 January 1913, p 1 [Trove, 4 April 2024]. Repeated on 2 January 1913.
27 It is interesting that Edward’s nephews Edward and Harry Hiah and Edward Hiah’s wife Sadie were living at 246 Murray Street, Perth from at least 1903. Edward Hiah had his own interactions with the police and the Chinese gambling community over the next few years; had a market gardener partnership, possibly in Albany; and moved to Sydney and worked as a greengrocer until his death in 1919. The parallels with Edward Teager are interesting, almost as if Edward Teager disappeared and was replaced by Edward Hiah!